|
|
- Evaluating participants was far too complicated during the first year. Instructors were expected to provide detailed evaluations of far more participants than humanly possible. During the second and third years the evaluation form was simplified and became far easier to use and far more useful.
- No proper agreements were reached regarding accreditation and certification. The first-year course was equivalent to Level 1 (KNHB: JHT course), the second year equivalent to Level 2 (KNHB: between JHT and A level) and the third year equivalent to Level 3 (KNHB: between levels A and B; in Durban and Cape Town: Level B). This did not necessarily mean that the participants reached the Dutch JHT/A/B levels. The course was much too short for that.
- Some centres issued certificates of participation, although other districts issued none.
- Instructors indicated clearly the level of each participant, but SAHA did not follow up in the sense of presenting a certificate.
|
|
|